Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
William M. Van Antwerp et al., Respondents, v. Henry Kelly, as County Treasurer, etc., et al., Appellants
130 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William M. Van Antwerp et al., Respondents, v. Henry Kelly, as County Treasurer, etc., et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 22, 1892;
decided February 9, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made December 8, 1888, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial.
Myer Nusbaum for appellants.
James F. Cooper for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm and for judgment absolute against defendants ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.