Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Green Island Ice Company, Respondent, v. Daniel Norton, Appellant
189 N.Y. 529·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Green Island Ice Company, Respondent, v. Daniel Norton, Appellant.
Green Island Ice Co. V. Norton, 105 App. Div. 331, affirmed.
(Argued June 12, 1907 ;
decided October 1, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third, judicial department, entered May .12, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action for an injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff’s control and possession of a certain field of ice.
Benjamin E. De Groot and Thomas F. Powers for appellant.
Frank 3. Beal and Henry J. Speck for respondent.
William 8. Jackson, Attorney-General (George P. Decker of counsel), for State of New York, intervening.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed,.with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.