Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Emily F. Thyson, Appellant, v. Frederick C. Thyson et al., Appellants. Meyer Goldberg et al., Respondents
188 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emily F. Thyson, Appellant, v. Frederick C. Thyson et al., Appellants. Meyer Goldberg et al., Respondents.
(Argued February 19, 1907;
decided March 5, 1907.)
Thyson v. Thyson, 114 App. Div. 911, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the . Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 12, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to 'compel the respondents herein to complete their purchase of certain real property sold to them at a partition sale.
John R. Farrar, Peter Cook and Frederick L. Prescher for appellants.
Philip 8. Pean for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gbay, Edwabd T. Babtlett, Haight, Vann, Webneb and Chase, JJ.