Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Charles Steinhardter et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Otto D. Steinhardter, Deceased, Respondents, v. Frederick C. Howe et al., Appellants
182 N.Y. 543·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Steinhardter et al., as Administrators of the Estate of Otto D. Steinhardter, Deceased, Respondents, v. Frederick C. Howe et al., Appellants.
(Submitted June 12, 1905;
decided October 3, 1905.)
Steinhardter v. Howe, 100 App. Div. 515, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 19, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
James C. de La Mare and J. Homer Hildreth for appellants.
Justin S. Galland for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ.