Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
James Bigler, Appellant, v. The National Bank of Newburgh, Respondent
97 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Bigler, Appellant, v. The National Bank of Newburgh, Respondent.
(Argued October 20, 1884;
decided October 31, 1884.)
The General Term reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff' upon the facts: The court- here held, that there was evidence-authorizing the reversal.
Theodore F. Miller for appellant.
E. A. Brewster for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
mem. for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute rendered against plaintiff on stipulation.