General
SHREVE et al. v. UNITED STATES
73 F.2d 543·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SHREVE et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 7460.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 9, 1934.
Charles G. Crouch, of San Diego, Cab, and Leslie C. Hardy, of Tucson, Ariz., for petitioner:’,.
Clifton Mathews, U. S. Atty., of Phoenix, Ariz.
Before WILBUE, SAWTELLE, and GARRECLET, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — WILBUR, Circuit Judge.]
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Daniel II. Shreve asks leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus against Albert M. Sames, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, commanding him to rescind an order made with relation to the settlement of the hill of exceptions striking certain matters out of the petitioners’ proposed bill of exceptions. The application is denied. The writ of mandamus cannot be used to control the discretion of the trial judge in settling a bill of exceptions. In re Bradstreet, 29 U. S. (4 Pet.) 102, 105, 7 L. Ed. 796; In re Richardson (C. C. A.) 30 F. (2d) 687; Dunagan v. Appalachian Power Co. (C. C. A.) 29 F.(2d) 58; Scaife v. West N. C. Land Co. (C. C. A.) 87 F. 308.