Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Cyrenius M. Green. Respondent, v. William H. Plank, Appellant
48 N.Y. 669·New York Commission of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Cyrenius M. Green. Respondent, v. William H. Plank, Appellant.
(Argued September 25, 1871;
decided January term, 1872.)
Action to recover possession of a canal boat, with damages for the taking and detention. After proof of title, of the taking, and that plaintiff had lost its use from the time of taking up to the time of trial, plaintiff, as a witness, was permitted to answer, under objection, the following question: “State the damages for the taking and withholding the boat during that time ?” Held, error, upon authority of case Matthews v. Matthews (2 N. Y., 514.)
Barlow & Kennedy for the appellant.
I). K M. Johnson for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Lott, Oh. 0., reads for reversal.
Hunt and Leonard, CC., concur.
Earl, 0., reads for affirmance.
Gray, C., concurs.
(The Commissioners dissenting agree with the majority upon the question of law, but hold that the evidence received could, by no possibility, have injured defendant.)
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event.