Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
David C. HAKIM and Margaret K. Hakim, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee
512 F.2d 1379·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1975
Before WEICK, McCREE and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David C. HAKIM and Margaret K. Hakim, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 74-1865.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 24, 1975.
David C. Hakim, pro se.
Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bennet N. Hollander, Ernest J. Brown, Gilbert E. Andrews, Jr., Stephen M. Gelber, Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Meade Whitaker, Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
Before WEICK, McCREE and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
The appeal from the decision of the Tax Court having come on to be heard upon the record on appeal, briefs and oral argument, upon consideration, it is ORDERED that the decision is hereby AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in the memorandum of Judge Drennen.