Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers' Assn., Inc. v. District of Columbia
314 U.S. 646·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 243.
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers’ Assn., Inc. v. District of Columbia.
October 13, 1941.
Messrs. John S. Barbour and Christopher B. Garnett for petitioner. Messrs. Richmond B. Keech, Vernon E. West, and Glenn Simmon for respondent. Mr. Charles W. Wilson filed a brief on behalf of the National Cooperative Milk Producers’ Federation, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.