Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Application of Thomas F. Ryan, as Receiver, etc. In the Matter of the Claim of Rawitser & Brother
141 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Thomas F. Ryan, as Receiver, etc. In the Matter of the Claim of Rawitser & Brother.
(Argued December 11, 1893;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Cross appeals from order of General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made July 5, 1893, which modified, and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee.
L. Lqftim Kellogg for receiver.
Otto Horwitz for Rawitser & Brother.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinión below.
All concur, except Babtlett, J., not sitting..
Order affirmed.
70 Hun, 149.