Bankruptcy
Sarah J. Lent, as Executrix of Adelaide V. Lent, Deceased, Appellant, v. William H. Farnsworth, Respondent
180 N.Y. 503·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah J. Lent, as Executrix of Adelaide V. Lent, Deceased, Appellant, v. William H. Farnsworth, Respondent.
Lent v. Farnsworth, 94 App. Div. 99, affirmed.
(Argued November 16, 1904;
decided December 6, 1904.)
Appeal, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 10, 1904, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion for an order directing the cancellation of record of a judgment in favor of plaintiff’s intestate and against the defendant upon the ground of its discharge by a decree in bankruptcy, and granted such motion.
Alfred W. Gray for appellant.
Nathaniel W. Norton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gbay, O’Bbien, Babtlett Haight, Vann and Webneb, JJ.