General
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Alex KUSNIERZ, Appellee
33 F.2d 887·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1929
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Alex KUSNIERZ, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 1, 1929.
No. 5747.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., and Tom De Wolfe, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash. (Wm. Wolff Smith, General Counsel, and C. L. Dawson, Atty., U. S. Veterans’ Bureau, both of Washington, D. C., and Lester E. Pope, Regional Atty., U. S. Veterans’ Bureau of Seattle, Wash., of counsel), for the United States.
W. G. Beardslee and Graham K. Betts, both of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.]
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
In its controlling substantive facts and the proceedings taken in the court below this ease is analogous to United States v. Buzard (No. 5727) 33 F.(2d) 883, this day decided, and for the purposes of the present appeal must be deemed to be ruled thereby. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not out of harmony with the principles and conclusions stated in the opinion in that case.