Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Walter Weston et al., Respondents, v. James R. Watts, Appellant
121 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walter Weston et al., Respondents, v. James R. Watts, Appellant.
(Argued April 28, 1890;
decided May 9, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 24,1890, which affirmed an order at Special Term denying a motion by defendant for an order directing the plaintiff Walter Weston to pay defendant a certain sum of money,
I). O. Briggs for appellant.
Gh. Frcmois Stone for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.