General
Chloe E. Persons et al., Appellants, v. Lucy M. Seargent, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
132 N.Y. 590·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chloe E. Persons et al., Appellants, v. Lucy M. Seargent, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.
'(Argued March 11, 1892;
decided March 25, 1892.)
■ Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court in the fourth .judicial department, entered upon an order made September .9, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant •entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Watson M. Rogers for appellants.
S. 0. Hwitimgton, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.