Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
Blackman v. Balaban & Katz Corp. et al.
350 U.S. 874·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 347.
Blackman v. Balaban & Katz Corp. et al.
Edward Blackman, pro se. Edward R. Johnston and Wesley G. Hall for Balaban & Katz Corporation et al., John F. Caskey and Francis E. Matthews for Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, Miles G. Seeley for Loew’s Incorporated et al., and Irving Goodman and John S. Miller for the 32 West Randolph Corporation, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.