Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
157 N.Y. 674·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The New York, Lackawanna and Western Railway Company, Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
N. T., L. & W. B. Go. v. Brie B. B. Go., 81 App. Div. 878, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 3, 1898;
decided October 11, 1898.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, rendered at the June Term, 1898, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the Monroe Special Term dismissing a petition under the Condemnation Law, Code of Civil Procedure, sections 3357 and 3360, to condemn a portion of defendant’s railroad.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment is not appealable under subdivision 1 of section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
John Gr. Milburn for motion.
Adelbert Moot opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs.