Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
Carmelo F. Carnana, Appellant, v. Aaron B. Cohn, Respondent
74 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carmelo F. Carnana, Appellant, v. Aaron B. Cohn, Respondent.
(Argued June 3, 1878;
decided September 17, 1878.)
J. S. O. Carnana for appellant.
Sterling & Waldron for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Folger, Rapallo and Andrews, JJ.,]
Folger, Rapallo and Andrews, JJ.,
for affirmance, on the ground that the sheriff did not proceed correctly in his sale, undertaking to sell more than the law authorized him to do.
Church, Ch. J., for affirmance, on the ground that the finding that there was no levy was warranted by the evidence.
Miller and Earl, JJ., absent.
No opinion.
Judgment affirmed.