Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Moritz Pach, Respondent, v. Lizzie Orr, Appellant
112 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Moritz Pach, Respondent, v. Lizzie Orr, Appellant.
(Submitted January 15, 1889;
decided February 5, 1889.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of Buffalo, made June 23,1888, which affirmed an order of Special Term vacating an order vacating an attachment.
Charles B. Wheeler for appellant.
0. 0. Cottle for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to modify order by striking out the words 11 and the lien of said attachment is restored,” and as modified affirmed; no opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.