Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
The State National Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. P. Richardson, City Tax Collector for the City of Frankfort, et al.
225 U.S. 696·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 223.
The State National Bank, Plaintiff in Error, v. D. P. Richardson, City Tax Collector for the City of Frankfort, et al.
In error to the Court of Appeals, of the State of Kentucky.
Argued for the defendant in error and submitted for the plaintiff in error April 24, 1912.
Decided April 29, 1912.
Mr-. Thomas Kennedy Helm for the plaintiff in error. Mr. F. M. Dailey for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Haseltine v. Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175.