Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of a Judgment Recovered by Ezekiel Fleming, Respondent, v. Edgar H. Nixon et al., Emma K. Tourgee, Appellant
136 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of a Judgment Recovered by Ezekiel Fleming, Respondent, v. Edgar H. Nixon et al. Emma K. Tourgee, Appellant.
(Argued November 29, 1892;
decided December 13, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 23, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside orders of the special county judge of Chautauqua county in supplementary proceedings.
Adelbert Moot for appellant.
B. A. Barlow for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.