Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wood et al. v. Putterman et al.
400 U.S. 859·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that,, probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 19, 1970
No. 704.
Wood et al. v. Putterman et al.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed oh appeal from D. C. Md.
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that,, probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.
[For earlier, order herein, see ante, p. 816.]