General
McKINLEY v. REILLY et al.
381 U.S. 276·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McKINLEY v. REILLY et al.
No. 1000.
Decided May 17, 1965.
Mark Wilmer for appellant.
Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.