Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
Japan-Atlantic and Gulf Freight Conference et al. v. United States et al.; and Federal Maritime Board v. United States et al.
345 U.S. 975·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 718.
No. 774.
Japan-Atlantic and Gulf Freight Conference et al. v. United States et al.; and Federal Maritime Board v. United States et al.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The motions in No. 718 for a stay and to advance, and for leave to file brief of A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi and others, as amici curiae, are denied. Certiorari denied.
Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk and George F. Galland for petitioners in No. 718. Francis T. Greene and Joseph A. Klausner for petitioner in No. 774. Acting Solicitor General Stern and Ralph S. Spritzer for the United States, respondent. John J. O’Connor, Thurman Arnold, Paul A. Porter and William L. McGovern for Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., respondent.