General
Edward Marshall, Respondent, v. George T. Murdock and George D. Sherman et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants
148 N.Y. 755·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Marshall, Respondent, v. George T. Murdock and George D. Sherman et al., as Executors, etc., Appellants.
(Submitted February 17, 1896;
decided February 25, 1896.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion for re-argument denied, without costs. (See 148 N. Y. 9.)