Tax

WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY et ux.

390 U.S. 339·Supreme Court of the United States·1968

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument. · Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY et ux. No. 871. Decided March 11, 1968. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Weinstein and Grant W. Wiprud for petitioner. John K. Speck for respondents. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U. S. 260. Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.