Administrative
Francis H. Stoddard, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant
94 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francis H. Stoddard, Respondent, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Appellant.
(Submitted December 6, 1883 ;
decided December 14, 1883.)
Edward S. Rapallo for appellant.
Lucien Birdseye for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to modify judgment by striking therefrom the sum of $130.58 for excess of interest allowed, and as modified, affirmed on opinion in Sanders v. L. S. & M. S. R. Co. (ante, p. 641).