Admiralty
Far East Conference et al. v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.; Pacific Coast European Conference v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.; and Far East Conference v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
379 U.S. 991·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 699.
No. 700.
No. 703.
Far East Conference et al. v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.; Pacific Coast European Conference v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.; and Far East Conference v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.
Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk, Jr., Seymour H. Kligler, Burton H. White, Elliott B. Nixon and Arthur E. Tarantino for petitioners in No. 699. Henry R. Rolph for petitioner in No. 700. Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk, Jr., and Seymour H. Kligler for petitioner in No. 703. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, James L. Pimper and Robert E. Mitchell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 119 U. S. App. D. C. 110, 337 F. 2d 146.