Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rose Brady et al., Appellants, v. William H. Maxwell, City Superintendent of Schools of the City of New York, Respondent
163 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rose Brady et al., Appellants, v. William H. Maxwell, City Superintendent of Schools of the City of New York, Respondent.
People ex rel. Brady v. Maxwell, 50 App. Div. 538, affirmed.
(Argued June 5, 1900;
decided June 19, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme "Court in the second judicial department, entered April 14, 1900) reversing an order of Special Term directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the defendant to place the names of the relators upon the list of those eligible to appointment as teachers in the primary department of the public schools of the borough of Brooklyn, city of New York.
George W. Titoomb for appellants.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (William J. Carr and Luke D. /Stapleton of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order.affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landón and Cullen, 3 J.