General
Randolph et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.; and Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al. v. Randolph et al.
334 U.S. 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 661.
No. 711.
Randolph et al. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.; and Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al. v. Randolph et al.
Clif Langsdale and Clyde Taylor for petitioners in No. 661. C. S. Burg, M. E. Clinton and Ellison A. Neel for petitioners in No. 711 and respondents in No. 661. R. Carter Tucker for Wood et al., respondents in Nos. 661 and 711.
[MAJORITY]
C. C. A. 8th. Certiorari denied.
Reported below. 164 F. 2d 4.