Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
James H. Chambers, Appellant, v. William H. Appleton et al., Respondents
84 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James H. Chambers, Appellant, v. William H. Appleton et al., Respondents.
(Argued February 1, 1881;
decided February 8, 1881.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term, affirming an order of reference herein.
The action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract on the part of the defendants by which they agreed to furnish their publications to fill the orders which had been obtained by plaintiff therefor. Plaintiff claimed the difference between the agreed price for which the publications were to be furnished to him, with expense of delivery added, and the price he was to receive under the orders. Held, that the action was one ex contractu involving the examination of a long account within the meaning of' the rule applicable to such cases, and so was referable.
William W. Badger for appellant.
Douglas Campbell for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per curiam]
Per curiam
opinion for dismissal of appeal.
All concur, except Rapadlo, J., absent.
Appeal dismissed.