Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Pino v. Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
349 U.S. 90199 L. Ed. 2d 1239·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 11, 1955.
No. 333.
Pino v. Landon, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Argued March 30, 1955.
Decided April 11, 1955.
Reuben Goodman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Paul T. Smith and Jacob Spiegel.
John F. Davis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard J. Blanchard.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 348 U. S. 870, to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Per Curiam:
On the record here we are unable to say that the conviction has attained such finality as to support an order of deportation within the contemplation of § 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The judgment is reversed.