Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Todd Shipyard Corp. v. Puleo, Administratrix, et al.; and H. E. Moss & Co. v. Puleo, Administratrix, et al.
331 U.S. 847·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1329.
No. 1384.
Todd Shipyard Corp. v. Puleo, Administratrix, et al.; and H. E. Moss & Co. v. Puleo, Administratrix, et al.
June 16, 1947.
Paul Speer for petitioner in No. 1329. Raymond Parmer and Vernon Sims Jones for H. E. Moss & Co., petitioner in No. 1384 and respondent in No. 1329. Jo,cob Rassner for Puleo, respondent in No. 1329.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certio-rari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Reported below: 159 F. 2d 842.