Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
COMMUNITY BANK et al., Appellants, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Appellees
525 F.2d 690·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1975
Before TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMUNITY BANK et al., Appellants, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Appellees.
No. 73-1808.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 25, 1975.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
Before TRASK and SNEED, Circuit Judges.
This Order is to amend the opinion in Community Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 500 F.2d 282 (9th Cir. 1974). The first full sentence on page 286 is hereby amended to read:
Section 210.9(a)(1) of the amended Regulation J, however, makes a payor bank accountable if it fails to settle for demand items before the close of its banking day of receipt, and Section 210.12(a) provides that only if settlement has been made by this time may the payor bank revoke prior to midnight of the banking day [next following the banking day] of receipt.