General
Alice Maud Biddiscombe, as Administratrix of William Biddiscombe, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alpin J. Cameron et al., Respondents
161 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alice Maud Biddiscombe, as Administratrix of William Biddiscombe, Deceased, Appellant, v. Alpin J. Cameron et al., Respondents.
Biddiscomb v. Cameron, 35 App. Div. 561, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1899 ;
decided January 9, 1900.)
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered respectively December 30, 1898, and January 10, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint at a Trial Term.
John BrooTcs Lernitt for appellant.
Leo Everett and Henry Galbraith Ward for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order and judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion
All concur, except Martin, J., dissenting.