General

Janie RUTLAND v. STATE

25 Ala. App. 674141 So. 925·Alabama Court of Appeals·1932·AL

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

141 So. 925 Janie RUTLAND v. STATE. 8 Div. 419. Court of Appeals of Alabama. March 29, 1932. Rehearing Denied April 19, 1932. Henry D. Jones, of Russellville, and F. S. Parnell, of Florence, for appellant. . Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the ■State. [MAJORITY — BRICKEN, P. J.] BRICKEN, P. J. This appellant was tried by the court without a jury. She was charged by indictment with violating the prohibition law. The judgment of conviction rendered by the court was proper and fully warranted under the evidence. No error appears. Affirmed.