Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Wilson's Lessee v. Campbell
1 U.S. 1261 Dall. 126·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1785·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wilson’s Lessee v. Campbell.
Ejectment.
A defendant in ejectment, who enters into the common rule, must confess lease, entry and ouster for all the tenements laid in the declaration.
Ejectment. Yeates, for the defendant,
when called upon at the trial to confess lease, entry and ouster, confessed lease, entry and ouster for part only of the tenements laid in the declaration.
This was opposed by Bradford, who contended,
that the defendant having taken general defence, when he first pleaded, and entered into the common rule, he must now confess lease, entry and ouster as to the whole ; but the plaintiff can recover no more than he proves the defendant to be in possession of. 1 Att. Prac. 317.
[MAJORITY — By the Court.]
By the Court.
The defendant must, in this case, confess lease, entry and ouster for the whole tenements laid in the declaration,
This case was determined at Carlisle N. P., on the 16th May 1785, before McKean, Chief Justice, &c.