Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Annie E. Langdon, Respondent, v. Mackenzie Schiff et al., Defendants. Mathew A. Broderick, Appellant
189 N.Y. 548·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Annie E. Langdon, Respondent, v. Mackenzie Schiff et al., Defendants. Mathew A. Broderick, Appellant.
Langdon v. Schiff, 130 App. Div. 888, affirmed.
(Argued October 2, 1907;
decided October 22, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 7, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term requiring appellant to complete his purchase of land sold at a foreclosure sale.
Ralph F. Prime, Jr., for appellant.
Charles Coleman Miller for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.