Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
GLOBE & RUTGERS FIRE INS. CO., Appellant, v. COMPANIA DE NAVEGACION, INTERIOR, S. A., Appellee; NORTHWESTERN FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; NATIONAL LIBERTY INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; ÆTNA INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; WESTERN ASSUR. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; LIVERPOOL & LONDON & GLOBE INS. CO., Limited, Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; FRANKLIN FIRE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee; PHŒNIX INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee
19 F.2d 496·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GLOBE & RUTGERS FIRE INS. CO., Appellant, v. COMPANIA DE NAVEGACION, INTERIOR, S. A., Appellee. NORTHWESTERN FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. NATIONAL LIBERTY INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. ÆTNA INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. WESTERN ASSUR. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. LIVERPOOL & LONDON & GLOBE INS. CO., Limited, Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. FRANKLIN FIRE INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee. PHŒNIX INS. CO., Appellant, v. SAME, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 20, 1927.
Nos. 4927-4936.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Louis H. Burns, Judge.
Henry P. Dart, Jr., of New Orleans, La., Robt. H. Kelley, of Houston, Tex., and T. Catesby Jones, of New York City (Dart & Dart, of New Orleans, La., Andrews, Street-man, Logue & Mobley, of Houston, Tex., Bigbam, Englar & Jones, of New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
John D. Grace, M. A. Grace, and Edwin H. Grace, all of New Orleans, La., for ap-pellees.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
For opinion below, see 14 F. (2d) 196. Rehearing denied July 18, 1927.
[MAJORITY — BRYAN, Circuit Judge.]
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
It was stipulated by counsel that the above eases should abide the result of the appeal in Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Compania de Navegacion, Interior, S. A. (No. 4926) 19 F.(2d) 493, this day decided and reversed. Accordingly the decrees herein are reversed, and the causes remanded, with directions to dismiss the libels.