Corporations
DANIEL O'NEIL, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents
69 Cal. App. 797·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1924·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 4988.
First Appellate District, Division One.
October 22, 1924.]
DANIEL O’NEIL, Appellant, v. FRANK C. SYKES et al., Respondents.
Municipal Corporations — San Francisco — Firemen’s Belief Fund.—Judgment reversed upon authority of Eurtey v. SyTces, ante, p. 310.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. Reversed.
The question involved in this case is in all respects similar to that in Hurley v. Sykes, ante, p. 310.
Sloss, Ackerman & Bradley for Appellant.
George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Pooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents. ...
[MAJORITY — TYLER, P. J.]
TYLER, P. J.
The question involved in this case is in all respects similar to that in Hurley v. Sykes et ad., ante, p. 310 [231 Pac. 748]. Upon the authority of that case it is ordered that the judgment be reversed and that a decree be entered in favor of appellant, with the direction that the writ issue.
Knight, J., and St. Sure, J., concurred.