Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Mercantile National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Henry B. Sire, Appellant
188 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Mercantile National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Henry B. Sire, Appellant.
(Argued April 22, 1907;
decided May 7, 1907.)
Mercantile Nat. Bank v. Sire, 111 App. Div. 923, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 17, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover on promissory notes.
RrcmJclin Bien for appellant.
Royall Yietor, William Y. Rowe and Albert S. Ridley for respondent. • •
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs and $1,000 damages for delay, under subdivision 5 of section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, •Haight, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Absent: Hiscook, J.