Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
William H. Mallory et al., Respondents, v. William Radde, Appellant
60 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Mallory et al., Respondents, v. William Radde, Appellant.
(Argued February 24, 1875;
decided April 20, 1875.)
D. C. Calvin for the appellant.
Samuel Hand for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Folger, J.,]
Folger, J.,
reads for affirmance; Grover and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Church, Ch. J., Allen, Rapallo and Miller, JJ., for reversal; no prevailing opinion.
Judgment reversed.