Corporations

Bernard Cahill, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant

183 N.Y. 581·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Bernard Cahill, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant. (Argued January 15, 1906; decided January 30, 1906.) Cahill v. City of Rochester, 96 App. Div. 557, affirmed. Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 14, 1904, affirming a judgment iii favor 'of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial. William W. Webb, Corporation Counsel (John M. Stull of counsel), for appellant. Henry R. Glynn and Harvey F. Remington for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion; Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann, Werner and Willard Bartlett, JJ; Not sitting : Hiscock, J.