Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
In the Matter of Proving the Will of Chester Moore, Deceased. Caroline D. Moore, Respondent; Lulu L. Bergtold et al., Appellants
187 N.Y. 573·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Proving the Will of Chester Moore, Deceased. Caroline D. Moore, Respondent; Lulu L. Bergtold et al., Appellants.
Matter of Moore, 109 App. Div. 762, affirmed.
(Argued January 31, 1907;
decided February 19, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division-of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 6, 1905, which reversed a decree of the Erie County Surrogate’s Court admitting to probate a paper propounded as the will of Chester Moore, deceased, and granted a new trial.
Simon Eleischmann and William R. Pooley for appellants.
Edward R. Bosley and Norris Morey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants rejecting the will on the stipulation, with costs in all courts, on opinion of Spring, J., below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.