General
UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN et al.
168 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1909
Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 10, 1909.)
No. 863.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
A. L. Coble, Asst. U. S. Atty. (A. E. Holton, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for the United States.
Mark W. Brown, for defendants in error.
Before GOFF and PRITCHARD, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case having been before the court on a former occasion, at which time the questions involved in this controversy were determined as reported in the case of Authel H. Freeman et al. v. United States, 157 Fed. 195, 84 C. C. A. 643, we do not deem it now necessary to add to or subtract from anything that was said in the opinion filed by the court at that time. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.