Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Albert MARCO, alias Albert Rossi, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
48 F.2d 1078·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert MARCO, alias Albert Rossi, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6463.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 8, 1931.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ST. SURE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of motion of appellee for dismissal of appeal upon ground that the order appealed from is not an appealable order, and after oral argument, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that said motion be, and hereby is, granted, that the appeal herein be, and hereby is, dismissed, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.