General
Arthur N. Tolson, Appellant, v. Frederick Schmidt, Respondent
139 A.D. 898·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1910·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Arthur N. Tolson, Appellant, v. Frederick Schmidt, .Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
.Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order for plaintiff’s examination before-trial.- '
Order affirmed, with ten ' dollars • costs and disbursements. No opinion.Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin (dissenting), -Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ, . . ' .
[DISSENT — McLaughlin, J. (dissenting):]
McLaughlin, J. (dissenting):
I dissent, upon the ground that there is nothing - in'the moving papers to show that the examination of the plaintiff is necessary ^ or material for the establishment of the defendant’s defense..