Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Administrative
William S. Keiley as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Charles Dusenbury, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
77 N.Y. 597·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William S. Keiley as Receiver, etc., Respondent, v. Charles Dusenbury, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued March 31, 1879;
decided April 15, 1879.)
Decided on the facts in the case.
Samuel Hand for appellant.
I). M. Porter for respondent
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Sapallo, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.