Bankruptcy
Geraldine Talley HOBBY, Debtor-Appellant, v. BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, Creditor-Appellee, and U.S. Trustee, Trustee
182 F. App'x 239·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Geraldine Talley HOBBY, Debtor-Appellant, v. BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA, Creditor-Appellee, and U.S. Trustee, Trustee.
No. 05-2005.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 2006.
Decided: May 25, 2006.
Geraldine Talley Hobby, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin Reginald Zimm, Glasser & Glasser, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Geraldine Talley Hobby appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing as moot her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order, and (2) denying her motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beneficial Mortgage Co. v. Hobby, No. CA-05-110 (E.D.Va. Aug. 11, 2005). We grant Hobby’s motions to amend and file her informal brief out of time and deny Hobby’s motions for a transcript at government expense, for a stay pending appeal, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED