Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Bartholomew Dunn, Appellant, v. Maximilian Morgenthau, Respondent
175 N.Y. 518·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bartholomew Dunn, Appellant, v. Maximilian Morgenthau, Respondent.
■Dunn v. Morgenthau, 73 App. Div. 147, affirmed.
(Argued June 8, 1903;
decided June 23, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 15, 1902, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Pette for appellant.
Samson Lachnan and Jesse W. Ehrich for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Yann, JJ.