Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Seymour Lowman, as Administrator of Charles G. Judd, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Elmira, Cortland and Northern Railroad Company, Appellant
154 N.Y. 765·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Seymour Lowman, as Administrator of Charles G. Judd, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Elmira, Cortland and Northern Railroad Company, Appellant.
Lowman v. Elmira, C. & N. R. R. Co., 85 Hun, 188, affirmed.
(Argued November 24, 1897;
decided December 14, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the-Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 27, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Frederick OollAm, for appellant.
Erwin J. Baldwin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.